The University of Wisconsin Press
Politics / History / Law
Emergency Presidential Power
From the Drafting of the Constitution to the War on Terror
How do we make sure that presidents have enough power to respond to national security emergencies—without jeopardizing the system of checks and balances?
Can a U.S. president decide to hold suspected terrorists indefinitely without charges or secretly monitor telephone conversations and e-mails without a warrant in the interest of national security? Was the George W. Bush administration justified in authorizing waterboarding? Was President Obama justified in ordering the killing, without trial or hearing, of a U.S. citizen suspected of terrorist activity? Defining the scope and limits of emergency presidential power might seem easy—just turn to Article II of the Constitution. But as Chris Edelson shows, the reality is complicated. In times of crisis, presidents have frequently staked out claims to broad national security power. Ultimately it is up to the Congress, the courts, and the people to decide whether presidents are acting appropriately or have gone too far.
Drawing on excerpts from the U.S. Constitution, Supreme Court opinions, Department of Justice memos, and other primary documents, Edelson weighs the various arguments that presidents have used to justify the expansive use of executive power in times of crisis. Emergency Presidential Power uses the historical record to evaluate and analyze presidential actions before and after the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001. The choices of the twenty-first century, Edelson concludes, have pushed the boundaries of emergency presidential power in ways that may provide dangerous precedents for current and future commanders-in-chief.
“Chris Edelson has successfully tackled a big and controversial topic with skill and grace. His balanced, fair-minded work is a welcome addition to a literature on presidential power in times of crisis that is often captured by partisans with a cause.”—Michael Genovese, author of Presidential Prerogative
Chris Edelson is assistant professor of government at American University’s School of Public Affairs. He practiced law in the District of Columbia and New York and served as state legislative director for the Human Rights Campaign in Washington, D.C.
For more, see his blog at http://chrisedelson.com/, or the Los Angeles Times op ed, Obama and the power to go to war (August 30, 2013, By Chris Edelson, http://articles.latimes.com/2013/aug/30/opinion/la-oe-edelson-obama-syria-military-action-20130830).
See his C-Span interview:
Inquiries regarding review copies, events, and interviews can be directed to the publicity department at email@example.com or (608) 263-0734..
Of related interest
Torture and Impunity
The U.S. Doctrine of Coercive Interrogation
Alfred W. McCoy
Critical Human Rights
LC: 2013010416 JK
376 pp. 6 x 9
Cloth $26.95 t
eBook $16.95 t
Adobe Digital Edition
About our e-books
Printing and cut/paste allowed, access on six different devices.
“Crisp writing and solid analysis. Edelson covers military tribunals, detention, the unitary executive theory, warrantless surveillance, torture, and the state secrets privilege, concluding with President Obama's military intervention in Libya. He explains how claims for inherent and unchecked executive power endanger individual rights and constitutional liberties.”
—from the foreword by Louis Fisher
Home | Books | Journals | Events | Textbooks | Authors | Related | Search | Order | Contact
If you have trouble accessing any page in this web site, contact our Web manager.
Updated 03/06/2014© 2014 The Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System