Reason after Its Eclipse
On Late Critical Theory
George L. Mosse Series in Modern European Cultural and Intellectual History
Steven E. Aschheim, Stanley G. Payne,
Mary Louise Roberts, and David J.
Sorkin, Series Editors
“Martin Jay is one of the most respected intellectual historians now
working, and any book by him is an important event. His subject here
could hardly be bigger: the idea of reason in Western thought over two
Martin Jay tackles a question as old as Plato and still pressing today: what is
reason, and what roles does and should it have in human endeavor? Applying the
tools of intellectual history, he examines the overlapping, but not fully compatible,
meanings that have accrued to the term “reason” over two millennia, homing
in on moments of crisis, critique, and defense of reason.
After surveying Western ideas of reason from the ancient Greeks through
Kant, Hegel, and Marx, Jay engages at length with the ways leading theorists of
the Frankfurt School—Horkheimer, Marcuse, Adorno, and most extensively
Habermas—sought to salvage a viable concept of reason after its apparent eclipse.
They despaired, in particular, over the decay in the modern world of reason into
mere instrumental rationality. When reason becomes a technical tool of calculation
separated from the values and norms central to daily life, then choices
become grounded not in careful thought but in emotion and will—a mode of
thinking embraced by fascist movements in the twentieth century.
Is there a more robust idea of reason that can be defended as at once a philosophical
concept, a ground of critique, and a norm for human emancipation? Jay
explores at length the communicative rationality advocated by Habermas and
considers the range of arguments, both pro and con, that have greeted his work./p>
“A magisterial rethinking of the
fate of reason, particularly in
German philosophy from Kant to
Of Related Interest
LC: 2015010451 B
256 pp. 6 x 9