The University of Wisconsin Press
The Political Animal
Special Issue of SubStance, Issue 117, 37:3 (2008)
Edited by Chris Danta and Dimitris Vardoulakis
In the variegated history of the philosophical definitions of “man,” one has survived since it has been given the status of the self-evident. The definition in question comes from Aristotle’s Politics: “the human is a political animal” (1253a3). There is something indisputable about this characterization: humans are, indeed, the most social of animals—they are denizens of the polis with its institutions and laws, its rulers, judges, and generals. It would be difficult to contend that any other animal has recourse to the political as much as the human. Each article in this issue responds—in its own way and by establishing its own protocols—to the exigency of the animal as it was formulated in Aristotle’s Politics. Each article is an act of response, a moment of interruption.
Inquiries regarding review copies, events, and interviews can be directed to the publicity department at firstname.lastname@example.org or (608) 263-0734.
230 pp. 6 x 9
e-book $9.99 s
Adobe Digital Edition
About our e-books
Printing and cut/paste allowed, access on six different devices.
Home | Books | Journals | Events | Textbooks | Authors | Related | Search | Order | Contact
If you have trouble accessing any page in this web site, contact our Web manager.
E-mail: email@example.com or by phone at 608-263-0733.
Updated January 21, 2011© 2011, The Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System